|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1057
|
Posted - 2015.09.16 09:37:07 -
[1] - Quote
Announcing an investigation based on the flimsy evidence made public so far would be pretty stupid.
If it was anyone else doing this, I'd say they must have additional intel to justify this action. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1057
|
Posted - 2015.09.16 13:22:20 -
[2] - Quote
Arec Bardwin wrote:Perhaps next year consider making the prizes some token golden/silver/bronze ship skins and let the teams fight over space honour instead of trillions in prize ships  If anyone is surprised that eve players will do anything to win prizes worth this amount of isk they are incredibly naive. This includes CCP of course. I think you are the naive one if you think people wouldn't compete with the same ferocity, be it for a unique ship, space honour, a medal, a title, a skin, a used Kleenex or just for fun and drama.
Maybe you've forgotten which game you are playing? |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1057
|
Posted - 2015.09.16 16:10:23 -
[3] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:Yeah, I don't think anyone would be that surprised if this was the last AT CCP is imperfect sure, but I doubt they are so foolish that they would throw away one of their more successful creations just because some players trolled them.
Captain Thunk wrote:No team came close to beating either of their teams. Fielding 2 teams is within the rules, sharing setups and AT ships is within the rules, they just didn't need to fix their own matches. Had they just genuinely fought each other they'd still get exactly the same share of AT ships and prizes because agreeing to split prizes is also within the rules. That sounds like a pretty good case for assuming their innocence until some actual evidence is produced to the contrary, doesn't it? |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1057
|
Posted - 2015.09.16 16:45:22 -
[4] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:That sounds like a pretty good case for assuming their innocence until some actual evidence is produced to the contrary, doesn't it? An accusation made by one of the team players on the Hydramel team led to the investigation that's currently taking place which either will, or will not, turn up concrete evidence. That's what investigations are for. One of their own players making the accusation is a good case for assuming that there needs to be an investigation. I'm not sure which part wasn't clear to you. All that is perfectly clear.
I think CCP absolutely needs to carry out an investigation. I do think it was a massive blunder for them to announce it publicly, but that is a different matter.
What I find really daft is that so many people are predicting the result of that investigation and calling it against Warlords and Camel.
Given the history of the groups involved and the obvious tournament prowess of the two teams, it's more likely that the investigation will turn up no concrete evidence at all.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1057
|
Posted - 2015.09.16 17:30:33 -
[5] - Quote
Helo Dhals wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:Given the history of the groups involved and the obvious tournament prowess of the two teams, it's more likely that the investigation will turn up no concrete evidence at all. If that is the actual outcome, you will see a massive drop in alliance participation next year. Why should anyone spend 80 some odd PLEX plus all the time/energy/ISK for practice, if there is no collective confidence in CCP's ability to provide/preserve an even playing field? I suppose that is a possible outcome. Like I say, it was stupid for CCP to announce the investigation.
Captain Thunk wrote:As for calling it publicly, that's just to show they're looking into it, rather than just silently ignoring questions about DHBs statement. You can't really fault CCP for doing that. I certainly can.
Unless they had clear and irrefutable evidence of collusion between Warlords and Camel before making that announcement, they took a significant PR risk. If they didn't have that evidence, they should have investigated in secret.
Captain Thunk wrote:Yet you've made your own prediction, so I guess you're no better. Have I? It was not my intention if I did.
I'm actually undecided, because I don't think there is sufficient information on which to base a worthwhile prediction.
I could make a wild ass guess, I could go along with the mob or I could stick to my alliance loyalties. But since none of these things convey any greater likelihood of a correct prediction, I don't think I will.
Captain Thunk wrote:What you're actually saying is you don't think they'll have left anything concrete as evidence that can be used to prove what they've done I don't think it's very likely that CCP will find anything concrete, no.
But what I'm "actually saying" is that I would not be in the least bit surprised to find you've all been trolled by HYDRA yet again.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1057
|
Posted - 2015.09.16 17:47:25 -
[6] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:The point at which the ships were taken it ceases to become a troll, even if that's how it started. No, that would just be where it escalated to a higher level of trolling.
Captain Thunk wrote:There's no way Hydramel can continue to exploit the same flaw in AT rules, so it hurts them more than anyone else. They've been exploiting it for 4 years now and I can't see how CCP cannot change the rules for next year and allow them to continue doing it. Sounds rather like they've just pulled up the ladder behind them, doesn't it?
Captain Thunk wrote:I too initially thought it was a troll, but if it was, it backfired. With so many people going full ******? I don't think so.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1057
|
Posted - 2015.09.16 18:13:21 -
[7] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:No, that would just be where it escalated to a higher level of trolling.
Sounds rather like they've just pulled up the ladder behind them, doesn't it? If you were a member of the Hydramel team I'd call that :backpeddling: Instead it's just bad spin. Bad spin on what?
If it was a massive troll, then it was a massive troll and you are one of it's many victims.
If it wasn't a massive troll, then it's up to CCP to try to salvage what they can from the PR disaster that will follow.
I'd rather it be the former than the later, tbh.
Captain Thunk wrote:When you kill off your multi-trillion annual income, that's pretty much guaranteed, it's very difficult, even if you were the offspring of Goebbels and the Iraqi Information minister, to spin this as something positive. A successful troll on an internet spaceships forum is a successful troll on an internet spaceships forum. I don't see what spin that needs.
Captain Thunk wrote:Did you name yourself Bad Bobby? or did CCP add the prefix once they saw you post? I don't know what CCP thinks of my posting. Given the number of subscribers it's brought to the game, I suppose they can't hate it that much. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1057
|
Posted - 2015.09.16 18:43:28 -
[8] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:I too want it to be the former, trolling themselves out of trillions of ISK with 1st and 2nd prizes year in, year out is hillarious. Good, I was beginning to worry that you had lost your sense of humour.
Captain Thunk wrote:Let's face the facts, Hydramel isn't just better than it's closest rivals, it's way better. I can't speak for teams like Nulli, but in the last 2 years in 7 matches, PL is 1-6 down to Hydramel - that's curbstompingly better than PL is. Sure, I'd go along with that. Given those stats.
Captain Thunk wrote:So yeah, I don't call losing out on your ability to take 1st and 2nd places every year a ~massive troll~
I'm not certain that's the way it would turn out, if this is a troll.
It really depends on how CCP react to the whole episode. That's where the real issue is: the unpredictable element that is CCP. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1057
|
Posted - 2015.09.16 19:00:57 -
[9] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:Troll or not, it only works because there's plenty of scope for this to *maybe* have happened, which means CCP are almost certainly going to have to tighten up on collusion and team sharing rules because it jeopardises the integrity of the tournament. I agree completely.
But CCP have been in many positions where all logic and sense dictates they should go one way and still they go the other.
Captain Thunk wrote:Even if found not guilty, which in the absence of verifiable evidence is a certainty, CCP can't ignore the fact the rules do need to change No argument there either. I also think it was only a matter of time before this occurred, if not this year then in the next few ATs it had to come to this, because of the poor ruleset CCP is currently using.
Captain Thunk wrote:So the days of taking 1st and 2nd places are over. 50 Ships instead of 75. I'm not sure that actually follows, but I can completely see why you think so.
Captain Thunk wrote:If it's a troll then it cost them at least 2.5 tril to do and that's best case scenario. That should make it particularly tough for people to top then.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1057
|
Posted - 2015.09.16 19:08:17 -
[10] - Quote
Cobat Marland wrote:they had a 65% chance of finishing better than everyone else by running two teams, which is forbidden, to have A team and B team. No it isn't. If it was, this thread wouldn't exist.
|
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1057
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 04:32:26 -
[11] - Quote
Mr Rive wrote:If you're not a hydra alt, you're rather daft. I'm surprised that you don't already know that I'm a long standing HYDRA member, as well as an ex-member of your own corp in PL. But we can put that surprise down to my ego and narcissism and move on.
Mr Rive wrote:If you ARE a hydra alt, then you're trying to justify ruining the tournament. I'm not trying to justify ruining the tournament. I'm debating whether the tournament has been ruined and if so, who by.
Mr Rive wrote:How does it make you feel to be the bad guy? I've been the bad guy for a long time. Just the same as you have. I don't find it feels like anything much, since it's chiefly in the perception of others. Being the object of such vehement hatred over space pixels and forum wars has always caused me to smile. So maybe that answers your question?
With that out of the way, maybe we can get back to the real subject?
You and I appear to disagree as to whether there is evidence of an offense being committed under the current AT ruleset. You appear to think that Warlords and Camel have effectively poured petrol over themselves and run into a burning building. I think it's much more likely that they've just trolled the **** out of you, your alliance, CCP and a fair section of the playerbase.
Neither of us really knows at this point. Maybe we'll find out when CCP complete their investigation and publish their findings.
You and I appear to agree that the current AT ruleset is poor and invites this kind of troublesome metagaming and controversy that probably isn't healthy for the future of the burgeoning e-sport that (I assume) both of us love.
We also appear to agree that regardless of the results of CCP's investigation those rules need to be improved.
Have I got all that right?
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1070
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 06:43:39 -
[12] - Quote
Lovey Dovey wrote:If it's a troll, then it blew up in their face and they're worse off than everyone else at the moment. They even made PL better off by lowering the available supply of Imps & Fiends, which means PL can charge more due to low supply. If you want to value everyone by the number of AT ships they currently hold, maybe.
I don't personally subscribe to that method of valuation. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1070
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 07:07:08 -
[13] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:This says it all, you simultaneously claim to be a member of Hydra yet can only suggest it might be an elaborate troll that backfired. No, I claim to be a member of HYDRA and suggest this might be a pretty straightforward troll that has succeeded.
Captain Thunk wrote:You can't say for sure because you don't actually know and while you think it's more likely it's a troll, you're not prepared to risk your credibility with a definitive answer because you accept that you could well be wrong as it is something the higher ups might have done and not clued you in on. Yes.
That's essentially what I've already said reworded in such a way as to make it sound like making wild guesses is somehow more noble and wise than accepting the limits of your knowledge.
Captain Thunk wrote:Interesting insight into Hydra and your position in it. I didn't claim to be anything more than a long standing member of HYDRA and only that after being accused of being a HYDRA alt. I've not claimed to be one of the Warlords or Camel AT teams. The last time I was in an AT team it was under the HYDRA ticker and nowdays my questionable past, PL affiliations and distinct lack of talent prevent me from competing alongside Warlords in the AT.
I've also made it abundantly clear that my knowledge is insufficient to make a determination about this controversy. I'm advocating we discuss the things we can actually discuss and leave the wild conjectures out of it.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1070
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 07:26:52 -
[14] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:My apologies, I admit the limits to my knowledge, I wasn't aware that HYDRA was anything but an AT team. Apology accepted.
HYDRA has always been more than just an AT team. Obviously the high profile of the AT team has a tendency to eclipse everything else.
Now, can we stop slinging **** at eachother and actually have a discussion about the subject at hand?
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1070
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 07:49:40 -
[15] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:Now, can we stop slinging **** at eachother and actually have a discussion about the subject at hand? Yeah, so back to the troll that backfired. Apparently not. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1070
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 08:01:04 -
[16] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:There's not much else we can discuss. We can't discuss the current AT rules and what improvements need to be made to them?
We can't discuss the current AT tournament structure and how that can be improved?
We can't discuss the place that AT ships play in the AT meta and the overall EVE economy?
We can't discuss the unstable nature of the EVE community and it's horrendous groupthink?
You feel that there is nothing constructive or valuable to add to this thread? Only more trolling, insults, rage, ignorance and hysterics?
Ok. I suppose it's just /thread then.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1077
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 12:23:45 -
[17] - Quote
Mr Rive wrote:none of these things can be reasonably discussed while the question of hydra's cheating hangs in the air. What went wrong was a symptom of the problem with the current ruleset. We're talking about cures, but everyone keeps dragging it back into whether they think hydra did/didnt cheat. Whether Warlords and Camel cheated or not, or whether this whole thing is a troll or not, will come out soon enough... or not. So I don't see much need to discuss it further than we already have.
Mr Rive wrote:Frankly, that question, as i keep saying, is irrelevant to next year. Which is why I think we can happily discuss the future, regardless of the verdict of the investigation, because the fact there is need for an investigation at all is the actual problem.
Mr Rive wrote:I think you actually want to fix the cause of these problems I do, because I want EVE and the AT to survive and flourish. However, I would rather it remains the classic sandbox EVE where anything goes and the weak just have to HTFU. The idea that EVE should be turned into a muted version of itself for some reason just doesn't work for me.
Mr Rive wrote:you just dont want to admit hydra did anything illegal or unethical, again. I'll admit it as soon as I know it to be true. In fact, I'll be laughing with the rest of you.
Mr Rive wrote:You sound like one of the good guys, I wouldn't be surprised if like many of the hydra team you didnt really 'care' why you kept winning as long as you got your payout at the end. That's fine, I might have done the same in your position, but dont keep pulling this back on to whether hydra is guilty or not, that's not the real problem with the tournament. I'm not one of the good guys by any stretch, but I'm also not an exploiter or rulebreaker, because I value my continued existence and prosperity within this game.
I very much did care about why we kept winning and I think that it's spurious to suggest our wins were all predicated on cheating.
I'm also not the one that keeps pulling this discussion back to the "did they / didn't they" question because I don't see the point in pure speculation. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1077
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 12:40:41 -
[18] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:I think we're in agreement that it should be a competition between teams, this was highlighted by PL before the tournament started and as it progressed. This led to rules clarifications CCP made as best they could. Ultimately, it seems it wasn't enough. It's not like CCP hasn't been liberal, in this thread alone I've highlighted several other ways that Hydramel could have achieved exactly the same effect without actually breaking any rules, but it seems to some this is no fun unless you break a few of the rules. This is where the danger is for Hydramel, CCP have given them scope to do what they've been doing for years now so this is more of an insult to CCP than anything else. We've already all agreed that Hydramel would have won just as easily without cheating. So I think this removes CCPs choice, they will clamp down on all forms of collusion. Which isn't a bad thing, afterall it's an Alliance Tournament, if you can't get 24 people in your own alliance to run tests then guess what, you're not an alliance. Yeah, I feel the current collusion rules are far too permissive and leave it so open to abuse. It also appears to me that the rules are very difficult to police and enforce. But we'll see the truth of that soon enough, I expect.
Captain Thunk wrote:It's a question of balance. It's undeniable AT ships are crowd pleasers, people like to see them on the line and 'sploding, but they are inbalanced and the points cost should start to reflect this. Great if you have them and want to use them, but they should never be the same points cost as the same class of hull. I don't see many people arguing with this. I think a better points balance is certainly possible. But do you think that the number, value and tournament viability of the AT prizes is right? I'm not sure we need prizes so valuable when the bragging rights alone would be sufficient to drive the best of us to compete. I'm not sure having the tournament prizes perpetuate an advantage over those that do not have them is really the right dynamic either.
Captain Thunk wrote:Personally, I hate the 'community' endless whining and personal attacks made directly at CCP employees. Yet they're expected to sit there and endure it endlessly with only perfectly polite responses, they can't ignore it because it would offend the delicate little flowers and they can't give an emotional response because of expectations of 'professional behaviour'. I think the situation is stupid and an indictment on modern humanity. It's not an Eve thing, it's not a gaming thing, it's a moronic culture that breeds entitlement. I rarely get involved, I don't often read eve-o, reddit or any of the others. I saw it in 2006 it hasn't changed any since. People on the internet. So often magical and so often down right disgusting. It's an insoluble problem in my mind, so I've always gone for the classic approach of killing them all and let "god" sort them out.
Captain Thunk wrote:Basically no, we're all waiting for the outcome of CCPs Investigation and killing time until it's complete. I think there needs to be more reading material in this waiting room.
Anyway, thanks for engaging me on the actual issues. Snigg #1.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1082
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 13:46:22 -
[19] - Quote
MissBolyai wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:HYDRA has always been more than just an AT team. Obviously the high profile of the AT team has a tendency to eclipse everything else. You mean Warlords of the Deep, right? No, I mean HYDRA RELOADED.
But following your lead and taking this all completely out of context, you can call me a Warlords Of The Deep member instead, I was only a member of Warlords for the blink of an eye, but nbd.
MissBolyai wrote:Or are you talking about mother Hydra and her offspring Camel and Warlords? It's somewhat harsh on Camel to claim that they are merely the offspring of HYDRA RELOADED when they in fact originated as an entirely separate entity and have their own independent tournament pedigree. Indeed, it was that independent tournament pedigree along with their small gang focus that led HYDRA in to a training partnership with them in the first place.
MissBolyai wrote:Hydra doesn't have an AT team. If you say so. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1082
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 14:40:12 -
[20] - Quote
MissBolyai wrote:if Camel had their own independent tournament pedigree, why did they need to share setups/ships/tactics with Warlords? Because they needed to practice against a top tier team in order to prepare themselves for the AT.
As a result they put out an amazing performance throughout the competition.
Since it clearly works, why knock it?
MissBolyai wrote:Trust me, I am the official spokesman for PL. And I'm the Sultan Of Brunei.
|
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1082
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 14:51:51 -
[21] - Quote
MissBolyai wrote:Practice against? or Collude with? You told me they didn't need to collude to win. But I'm pretty sure everyone can do with some practice before a tournament. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1082
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 15:18:17 -
[22] - Quote
You're entirely welcome to take everything I say out of context if you wish, but it's not going to lead to any meaningful debate on the issues.
And as I have already said, I wasn't present when the alleged events took place, so I can't attest either way.
If you've got any actual evidence, feel free to share it with the rest of us. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1090
|
Posted - 2015.09.19 05:37:40 -
[23] - Quote
Lovey Dovey wrote:got caught breaking AT rules for an alleged third time In ATIX collusion was not against the rules. HYDRA practiced with Outbreak, we fixed matches, no rules were broken.
In ATX HYDRA, Outbreak and YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT were all excluded from the tournament before it began.
You can read the official post by CCP here https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1356138#post1356138. All three groups had their application fees returned and no further action was taken. Please note that YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT is a PL affiliated group, so any offense we can be accused of comitting in ATX can be equally leveled at PL, but in reality no actual offense was committed by any of these groups - they just were not eligible to enter the tournament that year due to a change in policy decided upon by CCP and acted upon at a very late stage.
So there is no history of cheating in HYDRA. There is however a history of playing to the limit of the rules, in order to win, and occasionally being the victim of unfortunate CCP decisions. A history that we share with PL, our chief detractor.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1090
|
Posted - 2015.09.20 03:52:38 -
[24] - Quote
Lovey Dovey wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:Lovey Dovey wrote:got caught breaking AT rules for an alleged third time In ATIX collusion was not against the rules. HYDRA practiced with Outbreak, we fixed matches, no rules were broken. In ATX HYDRA, Outbreak and YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT were all excluded from the tournament before it began. You can read the official post by CCP here https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1356138#post1356138. All three groups had their application fees returned and no further action was taken. Please note that YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT is a PL affiliated group, so any offense we can be accused of comitting in ATX can be equally leveled at PL, but in reality no actual offense was committed by any of these groups - they just were not eligible to enter the tournament that year due to a change in policy decided upon by CCP and acted upon at a very late stage. So there is no history of cheating in HYDRA. There is however a history of playing to the limit of the rules, in order to win, and occasionally being the victim of unfortunate CCP decisions. A history that we share with PL, our chief detractor. "we fixed matches once and got caught breaking the rules the next year, but guys it's CCP making the bad decisions not us. You should also ignore that we recently got accused of cheating again and having our prize ships confiscated. Did you know Waffles & PL are from the same social group! They're cheating too! :reddit:" - Sad Bobby You are either really dumb or just desperate. Probably a mix of both. No, just pointing out that your statement about our history was factually incorrect. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1090
|
Posted - 2015.09.21 03:17:04 -
[25] - Quote
Lovey Dovey wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:No, just pointing out that your statement about our history was factually incorrect. Yeah you're right, you only got caught twice including this current incident and that's totally different. No, we have never been caught cheating.
It is totally different, because what I'm saying is true and what you are saying is false.
Since true and false are opposites, that is as different as it is possible to be. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1090
|
Posted - 2015.09.21 06:51:30 -
[26] - Quote
Lovey Dovey wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:No, we have never been caught cheating. Yeah, no. You got caught cheating in the build up to ATX, which was why you were barred from competing that year. No. HYDRA, Outbreak and Waffles were ruled ineligible to compete in ATX. We therefore were unable to compete in ATX and likewise were unable to cheat in ATX. All this was concluded before ATX started.
See this quote from CCP:
CCP Sreegs wrote:It is because of these philosophical beliefs and changes that we have come to the tough decision of removing three teams from eligibility for competition in Alliance Tournament X. Notice that it doesn't say "HYDRA, Outbreak and Waffles are cheating so we've banned them from the tournament". It doesn't say that because that isn't what happened.
Lovey Dovey wrote:There has also been enough evidence of breaking the rules for the AT this year that CCP have decided to prevent your group access to the winnings. There has been an allegation of cheating in this year's AT. An allegation that has not been upheld by CCP at this time. An allegation that is not supported by anything other than hearsay at this time. Until CCP rules either way on the allegations, they are just allegations, not facts.
Lovey Dovey wrote:That's not making things up, those are things that actually happened in the manner in which they happened. No it isn't and CCP historical verdicts on these matters are publicly available for anyone to verify the truth of it.
You started out claiming that we were caught breaking AT rules three times. Which is simply false.
Now your new interpreation is that the ATX verdict was a ruling that we were cheating and the ATXIII verdict (that hasn't even been given yet) is a ruling that we were cheating.
You can argue with me on these points as much as you like, but the facts remain the same. There is no history of cheating in HYDRA. That may or may not change once CCP returns the results of their investigation.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1090
|
Posted - 2015.09.21 09:49:19 -
[27] - Quote
DeadDuck wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:You can argue with me on these points as much as you like, but the facts remain the same. There is no history of cheating in HYDRA. Yeah... reminds me those Offshore Companys based in the Cook Islands. They are "legal", but for some odd reason the market knows that Tax Haven as "Crook Islands"...  It is still legal though.
If it were to become illegal, there would no longer be a need to joke about it being the "Crook Islands".
Once CCP changed the rules, we changed our behaviour in order to comply with them. There were obviously some issues with timing that meant we found ourselves on the wrong side of a CCP ruling for ATX. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1090
|
Posted - 2015.09.21 10:07:06 -
[28] - Quote
DeadDuck wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:[quote=DeadDuck] It is still legal though.
They are known by "Crook Islands" it's because the only thing legal is actually the Company, the facade, the name "Hydra" in this paralelism, if you prefer. What happens behind those facades it's very illegal...  I bow to your knowledge of these RL matters.
But the parallel is false, because in-game HYDRA appears to be crooked but actually obeys the rules to the letter.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1091
|
Posted - 2015.09.21 19:05:39 -
[29] - Quote
I've already dealt with all those arguments, please bring some new ones. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1091
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 02:55:00 -
[30] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:No you tried to claim Hydra is comparable to PL Only in reference to a specific CCP ruling, which impacted both of our groups:
CCP Sreegs wrote:Running list of removed teams:
Hydra Reloaded Outbreak. YOUR VOTES DONGÇÖT COUNT Bad Bobby wrote:in reality no actual offense was committed by any of these groups - they just were not eligible to enter the tournament that year due to a change in policy decided upon by CCP and acted upon at a very late stage. And in reference to my view that both teams play to win and bring all of their resources to that fight:
Bad Bobby wrote:There is however a history of playing to the limit of the rules, in order to win, and occasionally being the victim of unfortunate CCP decisions. A history that we share with PL, our chief detractor. So I'm not accusing PL of anything, other than slinging mud at us, for which their is ample evidence in this thread.
Captain Thunk wrote:Hydra directly attacks and insults CCP by trying to ruin Alliance Tournaments - this isn't metagaming or trolling as it's target is the company itself, it's just stupid. The truth is that HYDRA does not want to ruin Alliance Tournaments, the only one we believe we ruined (ATIX) was a massive **** up on our part and did not go according to our plan at all.
We were punished for that through the exclusion from ATX, which hit both of our teams, while CCP only decided to exclude one of yours. That's because they had a reason to be vengeful against HYDRA and no reason to be so against PL. We understand that we ruined the ATIX final, we understand that we caused CCP a massive embarrassment and lost them money. We are sorry for that and have no intention of repeating that performance.
None of this changes the simple fact that CCP has never upheld any claims that HYDRA has broken AT rules. Which is why I've been posting to set the record straight about that, because people claiming that we have broken AT rules on a whole load of occasions are just re-interpreting history out of ignorance or malice. |
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1091
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 02:57:33 -
[31] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:This isn't because Hydra 'lives on the edge' unluckily being the victim of CCPs judgements That exclusion was down to two things: bad timing and bad feelings.
The change of CCP attitude came suddenly and left us on the wrong side of the ATX entry requirements. We didn't have any time to fix that, because the entrance deadline had passed.
The bad feelings from CCP were justified and I totally understand why they came down hard on us that year. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1091
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 04:00:51 -
[32] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:And you've missed that Waffles has never been associated with PL in the way that Hydra's heads are.
Waffles use the same website and services so there's an *opportunity* for it to happen, but PL has clearly never used that opportunity which is evident simply by looking at the results in all of the tournaments ever. I think even you will agree that it's obvious that PL provides no actual support other than cheering those loveable little guys on during their matches.
Whenever CCP decides that because there is a link, even if it's not exploited, and Waffles can't participate then we just live with it as it's understandable that the public can be deceived into that kind of thing is happening when Hydra is clearly doing what it does even if we're not.
It's a shame though for Waffles isn't it? Man, they're loveable. It isn't me that keeps bringing up the link between PL and Waffles.
I personally don't think that the PL/Waffles link (or the link with Horde) is in any way relevant.
I did mention it myself as a minor aside, because it was somewhat relevant to discrediting some specific claims about HYDRA breaking AT rules. But I don't think it's a slight against PL and I made that abundantly clear in several posts.
While there may be some people who do think that PL/Waffles/Horde are an A/B/C team collective, I am not one of them. I also don't think any of that matters either way, because in my opinion A/B/C or even D teams aren't the core issue with the current AT rules.
I feel the core issue is that the current rules encourage and reward destructive metagaming to change the course of the AT in a way that most other teams cannot compete with.
I don't really have an issue with people throwing matches so that they can win big on EVE-bet, because it's not really significant in the grand scheme of things, nobody who has a fighting chance of getting AT ships has any reason to pull that kind of stunt for a few hundred bill on the side. So I don't think that issue has any more impact than inserting hostile agents in enemy AT teams in order to disrupt them and force under-performance in matches.
I'd like to see an AT structure and ruleset where nobody stands to gain anything from losing a match, but that's not what we have now.
[EDIT] Also, as an ex-PL veteran, I support Waffles and Horde as much as you do. That is to say, with cheers and the occasional eve-bet. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1092
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 04:46:07 -
[33] - Quote
Warlords and Camel are practice partners that share logistics, resources, theorycrafting, setups, prizes and a common ethos. None of this is up for debate and none of this is illegal in this year's AT.
What PL, Waffles and Horde do with respect to the above isn't relevant. Because it wouldn't be illegal for them just the same as it isn't illegal for Warlords and Camel. Plus they aren't the ones being investigated.
So I personally think we can put all that **** to bed.
The issues to debate are:
1) Did Warlords and Camel throw matches / have house rules? Because if they did then they are in breach of the rules.
2) Are the current rules and AT structure fit for purpose?
Since the answer to #1 is unknown and unknowable for any of us not directly involved, there isn't really much to debate. The evidence made public so far is pretty pathetic and lacks any kind of corroboration, so unless CCP can find some hard evidence or are willing to make a brutal judgement without such evidence, it really doesn't matter.
I found it interesting that CCP made a public announcement of their investigation, before anything beyond hearsay had been put forward publicly as evidence. It looked to me like they were going on a fishing expedition in the hope that someone would come forward to corroborate DHB's claims, because otherwise the idea of publicly announcing an investigation that had every chance of failing and turning in to another embarrassing PR disaster for CCP was pretty foolish. But maybe they were handed the smoking gun by someone, since they haven't said anything we cannot tell, except the fact they haven't said anything is pretty telling. Why sit on the smoking gun when this whole debacle can be put to bed?
So I, like you, am waiting for CCP's response on this issue. I know what my friends and alliance mates have said and I know where my loyalties and trust lies, so my feeling is that CCP will come back empty. Of course I may be wrong, but even still it'll be another fun tale to add to the EVE history books.
I think #2 is a subject that is fit for debate at this time. Because it doesn't matter what the result of CCP's current investigation is, the rules and AT structure need improvement.
The fact that they need to investigate allegations like this at all is a problem. The AT should be set up so these things are cut and dried and the results of matches can stand without question. Because while that isn't the case, we are going to see this kind of drama explosion on a regular basis, since why not cook up some chat logs and submit them to CCP whenever the AT result isn't to your liking? You know what they'll do, since they've set a precedent and you know they'll take time carrying out their investigation, so why not **** up the forums, troll the AT winners and inconvenience them with bogus confiscations whenever you can?
Running the AT this way is a recipe for disaster in my opinion. Sure, that disaster is impacting my friends at this point in time, but it'll also impact any other AT winner that has bitter and unscrupulous enemies going forward (and that's every AT winner). |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1092
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 06:32:52 -
[34] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:1) Pure conjecture, let's be real none of us are 'in the know'. According to DHB Wildcat, even he wasn't aware until the final weekend and it was only his frustration that led to an alleged convo over Skype with the team captain where the captain confided in him. Absolutely.
Captain Thunk wrote:The question is, why would he lie and put everything on the line? Every part of DHB's behavior with respect to this case has been foolish in my eyes and betraying his team mates, regardless of the truth or otherwise of the allegations, is just plain bad.
As to why:
The most obvious reason is he was upset and just exploded all over the forums.
Given the nature and content of his post, that looks pretty accurate. Since he had already decided to leave the team and clearly wasn't willing to take steps to defuse the bad blood between him and his ex-team mates, he wasn't putting anything on the line by throwing a handful of uncorroborated allegations and salty comments around.
Unfortunately Kadesh decided to turn it in to a lover's quarrel and escalate the whole thing with personal attacks in the opposite direction. This was even more foolish than DHB's behaviour in my opinion.
Once Kadesh started slinging **** back at DHB, it turned into a freakshow and DHB took the obvious next step by submitting a ticket to CCP, causing what would have been just a minor altercation between two idiots to turn in to an official case requiring an investigation. It was at this point that DHB put something on the line, not before, because at this point he was risking his own AT rewards.
Obviously if DHB's allegations were false, he had total control over that risk, because he would have known there was no case to answer for and it would just be an escalation shitstorm that would eventually blow itself out. If DHB's allegations were true then, and only then, was he actually risking anything he hadn't already sacrificed.
So either DHB just thew a drama hand-grenade and walked away. Knowing nothing would really come of it.
Or he was forced by his emotions and e-honor to bring down his own team for an offense that was either real or perceived.
Either option is entirely plausible and consistent. Both are things we've seen many times before.
Captain Thunk wrote:If, as you suggested earlier, it's a troll then it's backfired for reasons I've stated numerous times and I hardly think CCP are going to look too kindly to their time being wasted all for someones elaborate joke. I assumed this would be the cause because of my long experience with HYDRA. It may not make sense from the outside, but from the inside a massive self-inflicted drama bomb apocalypse was always very likely.
Sane minds do not often prevail in HYDRA. But tbh, that's one of the reasons why I've enjoyed my time in HYDRA so much.
Captain Thunk wrote:So to me, in addition to DHBs reputation, it would seem he's telling the truth because there's no alternative motive that fits. I think that line of reasoning assumes that DHB carefully planned this out, wasn't just raging hard on the forums and didn't just escalate after being raged back at.
Looking at his posts, I don't see any sign of careful planning, wisdom, caution or even the effort to make coherent arguments. I think he was just throwing his toys out of the pram.
I think stupidity is a far more compelling cause to this drama than conspiracy.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1092
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 06:47:52 -
[35] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:2) I think you said yourself in an ealier post that they clearly are not, which fits in with PLs line of thinking which had been pointing out the obvious problems before the AT even got underway. It's kinda sad as it was so avoidable Yeah, we're on the same page.
Captain Thunk wrote:I've listed numerous ways the Hydra heads could have colluded within the rules And in my mind that's even more reason to question the allegations. But that's issue #1, not issue #2, so I'll move on.
Captain Thunk wrote:fan favourites like Waffles are unlikely to ever be allowed to participate again because of something that Hydra does and noone else does. I'd hate to see that be the case.
Captain Thunk wrote:I mean, let's face it - it's not exactly ~clever manipulation of the rules that noone else saw~. It's just that the other 62 teams playing in the AT all got it, we didn't have Goonswarm fielding 20 teams just for the lolz or anyone else. To make it much much worse this is all after CCP lopped of a bunch of Hydra heads a few years ago to underscore the point. Again, everyone else got the message except Hydra. It's naive to say that no-one else saw the scope for the abuse when they were saying it before the Tournament started, It was an obvious approach to take if you want maximum rewards.
But obviously, only people who can put together two or more winning teams can really expect to benefit from it. Goonswarm could have fielded 20 teams just for the lolz, but none of them would have had a realistic chance of winning. They would have had to enter enough teams to exclude all the potential winners in order to gain anything and that's just not a realistic plan.
Everyone saw what was happening, because nobody was hiding it. The commentators spoke repeatedly on this matter, because there was no effort or need to hide what was entirely within the rules.
The fact that those rules were bad isn't a crime that HYDRA, Warlords or Camel committed. They just do what people who play to win do and they took advantage of every opportunity they could to win and maximize that win. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1092
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 06:57:01 -
[36] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:it's just everyone else understands that taking on the company itself is a lot different to trolling players. Really, nobody in HYDRA, Warlords or Camel wants to **** on CCP. That is just an opinion you and others have formed. It's just not true.
Captain Thunk wrote:So yeah, CCP is going to have to spend a lot of extra time clarifying AT rules to the minutest detail specifically and solely for Hydra, the other 62 teams got the message years ago. Waffles and any other fan favourites similarly affected will just have to accept they don't get to play anymore. I very much hope not, but I don't see why this has to be the case.
It would seem like a pretty stupid way of progressing from this point to repeat the same mistakes that CCP have made countless times in the past. It's pointless for a small company like CCP with finite resources, finite skills and finite knowledge to attempt to out smart the rest of the playerbase. It's never worked before and it'll never work in the future.
Just formulate tournament rules and a tournament structure that aims for the achievable. Make it so nobody achieves a benefit in the AT from throwing a match in the AT. Sure, they can win big on EVE-bet or something but that hardly matters.
It then doesn't matter how many teams I enter from my multi-headed troll beast. Because I can only win if I win. There is no incentive to throw matches, there is no reason for destructive collusion and there is no need for CCP to investigate such allegations to the detriment of everyone. The sandbox metagaming that EVE is famous for can carry on without any unnecessary impact on the tournament.
The idea of handing the AT over to the lawyers is just plain silly. I very much hope CCP doesn't go that way. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1092
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 07:23:38 -
[37] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:one of the last lines did catch my eye as I scrolled frantically for the bottom of the abyss. Quote:It then doesn't matter how many teams I enter from my multi-headed troll beast. Because I can only win if I win. As a spectator sport it dies, no-one wants to watch a handful of rich alliances buy up all the AT slots and play with themselves My point is that it doesn't matter. If there is no massive advantage to be gained from doing it, we will not do it. Chances are nobody else will do it either. Remove the incentive to do things that are bad for the AT and people will probably stop doing things that are bad for the AT. Continue to directly encourage destructive behavior by giving an incentive to throw matches for your own teams benefit and this **** will continue. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1092
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 07:28:47 -
[38] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:Captain Thunk wrote:one of the last lines did catch my eye as I scrolled frantically for the bottom of the abyss. Quote:It then doesn't matter how many teams I enter from my multi-headed troll beast. Because I can only win if I win. As a spectator sport it dies, no-one wants to watch a handful of rich alliances buy up all the AT slots and play with themselves My point is that it doesn't matter. If there is no massive advantage to be gained from doing it, we will not do it. Chances are nobody else will do it either. Remove the incentive to do things that are bad for the AT and people will probably stop doing things that are bad for the AT. Continue to directly encourage destructive behavior by giving an incentive to throw matches for your own teams benefit and this **** will continue. Yeah, I'm sure Lance Armstrong wouldn't have bothered with performance enhancing drugs either if they didn't offer him an overpowering advantage. Indeed. There would have been no sense in him doing so. Hence my point.
Captain Thunk wrote:Blame the drugs, not Lance. Blame Lance for using the drugs, sure.
But don't bury your head in the sand and say that drugs don't exist and the advantages they offer don't exist.
Unfortunately for RL sports they don't occur in a controlled environment where these things can be trivially eliminated. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1092
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 07:36:23 -
[39] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:So what you're saying is after countless warnings and explainations, even though every single other competing alliance gets it, Hydra just cannot possibly resist the temptation to cheat? No, I'm saying that there are simple ways to make the tournament better, regardless of who competes. You don't have to leave massive holes in the AT structure and ruleset that invite bad people to drive busses through them.
It really doesn't matter if HYDRA is guilty of what you claim or not, the rules still need to be improved.
Just asking everyone to behave in an honorable way and not cause any drama or trouble isn't going to work. The idea that it would is just plain stupid.
Make the rules reflect the AT you want to see, not the the AT you want to avoid. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1092
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 07:41:34 -
[40] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:And it's CCPs fault for not instituting a 300 page explanation of the rules that locks every possible avenue down. No, that's the opposite of what I said. |
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1092
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 07:57:37 -
[41] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:It's not CCPs job to chase after one alliance spread across several parts because they consistently ruin the tournament. Which is why it's daft to have the rules set up so that it becomes their job by default.
That's why I say having rules that simply work and don't require a huge amount of effort to police will benefit CCP, benefit the AT and prevent all this totally unwarranted drama from exploding every time someone doesn't like the AT result. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1092
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 09:46:03 -
[42] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:Bad Bobby wrote: What I say on Joe when it's all fun and games and nobody is taking anything seriously is one thing. But once a whole host of monkeys start flinging their faeces in my direction, spreading lies and propaganda and making a fairly concerted effort to have me and all my friends banned then a more serious and considered response is justified.
I'm sure you can understand the distinction.
Yeah, I can understand that and it's fine. We'll just pencil it in as another troll that backfired. And this time, you'd even be right.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1092
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 10:28:24 -
[43] - Quote
Mr Rive wrote:Your whole argument revolves around 'but honestly we didnt KNOW CCP would get upset that we fixed their entire tournament with outbreak! Our cheating wasnt technically against the rules, why are you holding it against us it's not fair we just want to play the game you guys. You guys?' :Cartman:
Nobody is that dense. Give it up. You goofed, now you're scared youre gonna get banned for real. Nothing you will say now will change the outcome of the verdict, and you're just making it worse trying to absolve yourself of any guilt.
Why is it so difficult to say okay we ****** up, it will never happen again, we will try and profit from the tournament through honest means in the future? Rive, I don't expect you to read everything I've posted.
But please, don't pretend that it can all be summed up with a few sentences that point in the total opposite direction to everything I stand for in the game.
If the final of ATIX had gone the way we had planned, which it absolutely did not, none of this would have happened. Unfortunately we were nowhere near as good at fixing AT matches as we thought we were and the whole thing turned in to the most embarrassing farce.
It wasn't against the rules, be it technically or otherwise. Put it in italics or bold if you want. But it certainly screwed up a whole lot of things and I'm personally very sorry that it went that way.
I'm not scared that I'll be banned btw. Because even if Kadesh fixed every match in the AT while simultaneously posting **** sandwiches to every CCP staffer it would never come back on me.
We certainly ****** up in ATIX, but to say it will never happen again is not within my power.
I will not be planning to profit from the AT, or anything else, by purely honest means because that's just not the game I play. But I have never and will never break AT rules. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1092
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 10:35:53 -
[44] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:Are we meant to be looking forward to the day Hydra finally perfects their AT match fixing technique?
I'm not sure that would be in your own interests.
At the moment our problems seem to be more HR related anyway.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1094
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 10:57:32 -
[45] - Quote
Mr Rive wrote:Do you really think continuing on this line is going to gain you ANY support? You of all people are in no place to lecture me on effective PR.
Mr Rive wrote:You really can't win this one, no matter how hard you try to spin it. I'm sorry Rive, you seem to have forgotten that we did win this one.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1094
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 11:08:15 -
[46] - Quote
Mr Rive wrote:First off, whose 'we'? I thought warlords and CAMEL were the finalists, not hydra. Make up your mind Rive, are we all the same group or not?
Mr Rive wrote:Didnt hydra get banned for fixing matches like you just said they did? No. HYDRA never got banned from anything for fixing matches.
We got excluded from ATX because we entered HYDRA and Outbreak and CCP ruled them ineligible to compete in that tournament. The rules and CCP's philosophy had changed between ATIX and ATX. That left us on the wrong side of the line without any time to change our course.
Mr Rive wrote:Second, you 'won' AT IX too, and that turned out great for you in the long run, didnt it? It did actually, but it wasn't without it's issues, as I've already explained.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1094
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 11:19:26 -
[47] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:Mr Rive wrote:You really can't win this one, no matter how hard you try to spin it. I'm sorry Rive, you seem to have forgotten that we did win this one. No man, you've lost. Citation?
Captain Thunk wrote:You literally said that Hydra's fixed matches but didn't do it well enough while simultaneously saying wildcat is a liar with his logs and you haven't fixed matches despite his reputation that he's built over many years. No.
I said we fixed matches when it was legal to do so.
I said we stopped fixing matches when it ceased to be legal to do so. CCP made it pretty clear on this point so we weren't really left in any doubt.
I haven't said Wildcat is a liar at all. I've made it quite clear that I don't know the truth of the matter. Just reading his posts, I feel he was just throwing a hissy fit. Even if it turns out to be all lies, I think he has extenuating circumstances that would prevent me from calling him a plain liar.
Captain Thunk wrote:If you still think he's trolling, then I for one would love to hear CCPs reaction when they find out their time and resources are being wasted. I don't think he's trolling now, because I've had time to investigate it all further. But that was certainly my first instinct having read his post. Now I think he's just upset and behaving irrationally.
But yeah, I doubt CCP is going to be happy with this whole situation no matter how their investigation ends.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1094
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 11:24:40 -
[48] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:You have to admit, it really does look quite bad for Hydra No. If CCP comes back with a verdict against us, then it might look bad for HYDRA. In the meantime, this is just a bunch of people shooting the **** about AT drama.
Captain Thunk wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:Mr Rive wrote:Didnt hydra get banned for fixing matches like you just said they did? No. HYDRA never got banned from anything for fixing matches. We got excluded from ATX because we entered HYDRA and Outbreak and CCP ruled them ineligible to compete in that tournament. The rules and CCP's philosophy had changed between ATIX and ATX. That left us on the wrong side of the line without any time to change our course. You said yourself that Hydra was victim of CCPs rulings. It's pretty clear that they intentionally found a way to exclude Hydra precisely because of the final the year before that Hydra ruined by badly staging the fight. You admitted as much yourself. I think they changed the rules and their philosophy for that reason.
I think they excluded one of my teams and your Waffle bros due to that rule change.
I think they excluded my other team (and not your PL bros) as vengeance for the badly staged final in ATIX.
I made that all pretty clear in my previous post that you are referencing.
Captain Thunk wrote:That was the warning. The, "hey, yeah, don't ever do that again moment". I'm not sure why you haven't realised that and done it again this year. Maybe CCP have to explicitly tell the Hydra teams in clear language, like the rules. I'm sorry but that is all predicated on the idea that we actually broke the rules this year. Which is something you've confirmed is unknown to both of us.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1094
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 11:33:45 -
[49] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:Captain Thunk wrote:No man, you've lost. Citation? Scroll up, it's the bit where you basically say "We f****d up fixing matches, sorry you guys noticed, it wouldn't have happened if it wasn't for the rules getting in the way - CCP need to fix that" I didn't say that, basically or otherwise.
I think I've been pretty clear on this, so if you aren't understanding me after all this posting then there isn't much more I can do for you.
Either way, I don't see how the statements of a HYDRA member that wasn't involved in this AT in any capacity other than as a spectator would make any difference to Warlords or Camel winning or losing the AT.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1094
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 11:38:06 -
[50] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:Bad Bobby wrote: I'm sorry but that is all predicated on the idea that we actually broke the rules this year. Which is something you've confirmed is unknown to both of us.
Listening to your sketchy defence and DHB Wildcats post, I can't help but feel it's looking like this did all happen. Basically you're down to saying that Wildcat must have had a mental breakdown because that's literally the only thing that can plausibly explain the events of the last week. That's a desperate argument. I would be extremely surprised if other AT members from one of Hydra's heads haven't seen whats coming and confessed what they know to save themselves. They all know it's only going to take a few out of a pool of what 30? 40? and they aren't going to want to be the ones that end up carrying the can. Truth always outs as you've been eloquently demonstrating during the course of this thread. No.
Throughout this discussion you have made every effort to misinterpret and distort my statements to suit your own agenda.
All I have to do is keep posting the truth and being a comparatively reasonable participant in this debate to win it. You're doing all my work for me. |
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1094
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 11:42:49 -
[51] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:Either way, I don't see how the statements of a HYDRA member that wasn't involved in this AT in any capacity other than as a spectator would make any difference to Warlords or Camel winning or losing the AT.
So you're now backpeddling and saying you have no clue as you're not involved in any capacity. No, I've been saying that since page 4 of this thread.
That's not backpeddling, that's simply stating the simple truth over and over again.
The reason why I'm bringing my lack of relevance up, is that you seemed to think that things that I said somehow constituted an AT loss for Camel and Warlords. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1095
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 11:48:49 -
[52] - Quote
Hoodie Mafia wrote:Wow 12 pages, keep on going gents
I wonder how many extra pages we can make it to once the bans are official I think there will be far more drama if the reverse occurs. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1095
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 12:49:46 -
[53] - Quote
Mr Rive wrote:This isnt a debate. It looks like one, at least when it's not a pissing contest.
Mr Rive wrote:This is the question of whether hydra cheated this year. It's a lot more than that. At least from my perspective. I don't even know why we would even concern ourselves with that question, since CCP's verdict is what matters.
Mr Rive wrote:Debates dont have yes or no answers. Debates don't generally have answers, be they yes, no or otherwise.
Mr Rive wrote:Did hydra cheat? Yes? No?
Everything that you have said so far pushes the perception to 'yes'. It wasn't possible for me to push your perception to "yes" because that's where it started.
You can't speak for the perceptions of others, because you don't know or understand them. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1095
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 23:10:07 -
[54] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:As you said Bad Bobby, short of DHB Wildcat having somekind of meltdown, his allegations are certainly true. I don't think I said that. My opinion right now is that his allegations of match fixing are false and that CCP has sufficient proof to confirm that.
Captain Thunk wrote:So it's a question of probability. Hydra, very probably cheated and fixed matches, just like it has a history of doing. It's not a question of probability, because there is no random number god at play here. There are facts, there is evidence and there is CCP's decision on how to proceed. The facts and evidence don't support your claims of match fixing and the only unknown is CCP.
Captain Thunk wrote:There just aren't many alternatives that fit the situation. Well, there is the obvious one, that DHB got angry, posted stuff, got abuse back, got even angrier and petitioned.
That's certainly a lot more plausible than your alternative, in my opinion.
Captain Thunk wrote:Judging by how you've moved your stance in the last few days I think you're beginning to realise where exactly this is all going. I can't claim to know where we will be in a week or so. I don't have your omniscience.
But that's not really my role in all this, my chief concern is that we are in the best possible position we can achieve for the next AT and the AT after that.
Captain Thunk wrote:So, with that in mind, how do you think the 30-40 boys on the teams are holding out?  I think they're fine, particularly since they know a lot more about this whole situation than you do.
The rest of your post is predicated on what I believe to be your hubris. So I don't think I really need to answer it.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1095
|
Posted - 2015.09.22 23:14:48 -
[55] - Quote
Overall I think I've achieved what I set out to in this thread and in the absence of a CCP verdict, I can declare victory and take my rest for now.
I'd like to thank the PL posters for being so co-operative. I didn't expect to get such an easy ride. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1095
|
Posted - 2015.09.23 04:46:55 -
[56] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:I was wondering when Hydra was going to order you to stop posting. I don't think you understand HYDRA leadership.
There are certainly some posts on this subject that I could have done without, but not in this thread. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1095
|
Posted - 2015.09.23 04:55:07 -
[57] - Quote
Ion Udan wrote:what did DHB have to be angry at? I'm not going to repeat the mud slinging that started this debacle, if you want the answer to your question there are two locked threads where you will get a 1st person perspective on it, regrettable though they may be.
Ion Udan wrote:And you admit yourself this will continue to occur until the rules are written in a way that no one can spin them in a fashion that could be misinterpreted. No, actually. My recommendation wasn't that the rules get turned in to something that specifically forbids every possible transgression, but that the rules and structure are altered so that it isn't needed. If nobody has a illegitimate incentive to throw a match, then the very question of match throwing can be put to bed and CCP will not have to worry about these drama bombs.
Ion Udan wrote:I'll be very interested to see how this plays out. Me too. I can't think of anything relevant that hasn't been covered now, so all that remains is to wait for the CCP verdict. Then I'm sure the drama will continue.
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1095
|
Posted - 2015.09.23 07:04:23 -
[58] - Quote
I wish I could offer you some insight in to DHB's decisions on this, but they are as much of a mystery to me as they are to you.
Ion Udan wrote:In regards to your reply about the rules of AT "If nobody had an illegitimate incentive to throw a match, then the very question of match throwing can be put to bed"
That is a very subjective statement, what drives player A may not drive player B. The whole purpose of a tournament is to have a winner. If player A is focussed on ISK, and the AT has a massive ISK reward, then he has motivation. However if player B is not motivated by ISK, but eHonor and winning, then he has motivation no what the "reward" is. Just winning is his motivation. It doesn't matter if the person is driven by isk, e-honor or the desire to be the best of the best.
If throwing matches doesn't help them win, then they can gain no riches, e-honor or other accolades from doing it.
Double elimination tournaments allow a team to lose a match/series and still continue to compete. They can throw matches and still win.
Single elimination tournaments do not have the same dynamic. If you lose a match/series then you are out and cannot then go on to benefit from your loss later in that tournament.
You can certainly throw one match in a series, in order to fake out your opponents or gain some information advantage, but I don't think that's the kind of match throw that anyone wants to prevent.
You can certainly throw matches in order to win big on eve-bet, but that's outside of the scope of the tournament rules and probably not as big a deal either.
So my point is that tournament structure has a massive effect on what kind of metagaming is viable. Choosing double elimination makes the kind of match fixing that Warlords and Camel are accused of viable and also offers a significant incentive to field two teams in the tournament, since those two teams facing eachother before the finals isn't a problem.
Choosing double elimination and making these metagaming options viable also means that when accusations start flying around CCP have to spend time investigating it and suffer the PR problems associated with it. If that metagaming is not viable then they don't have that unwarranted extra workload and unwanted controversy to deal with. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1095
|
Posted - 2015.09.23 07:17:30 -
[59] - Quote
Hoodie Mafia wrote:In short;
CCP should not have picked double elimination, this forced Hydra/Camel to do match fixing Damn you CCP... It allows anyone to be rewarded by match fixing.
And it allows anyone to make accusations of match fixing and force CCP to deal with the fallout.
It doesn't matter if any match fixing actually occurs, the damage and negative dynamic still remains.
I am not saying that single elimination is a magic bullet, but I do feel that it has a better balance of upsides and downsides when compared to double elimination. It's certainly still possible to benefit from match fixing, but you have to fix other people's matches, not your own and that is a much harder prospect. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1095
|
Posted - 2015.09.23 07:47:50 -
[60] - Quote
Lovey Dovey wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:We were punished for that through the exclusion from ATX, which hit both of our teams, while CCP only decided to exclude one of yours. That's because they had a reason to be vengeful against HYDRA and no reason to be so against PL. That's not the reason at all, and thinking it is supports the notion that you suffer from a victim complex. I do love internet psychologists. Please tell me more.
Titans 4U convinced most of the internet psychologists of EVE that I'm a psychopath, so I'm interested to see how you think those two disorders interplay. |
|

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1095
|
Posted - 2015.09.23 08:23:30 -
[61] - Quote
Lovey Dovey wrote:Please provide evidence that CCP barring Hydra/Outbreak for violating rules was actually because they wanted vengeance for the match fixing in ATIX as you claimed.
I'll wait. Sure, I'll swap it for evidence that your opinion matters. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1095
|
Posted - 2015.09.23 08:55:28 -
[62] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:Lovey Dovey wrote:Please provide evidence that CCP barring Hydra/Outbreak for violating rules was actually because they wanted vengeance for the match fixing in ATIX as you claimed.
I'll wait. Sure, I'll swap it for evidence that your opinion matters. That's a bit mean, none of us are important enough to have our opinions really matter. That doesn't come across in his posting though, does it?
Captain Thunk wrote:He does have a point though about the defensive complex, you do seem to feel that CCP has victimised Hyrda when it's actually CCP who has to deal with the extra workload and problems that having Hydra in creates. Which I covered in the very next sentence of the post Lovey Dovey is quoting, as well as in other posts.
Bad Bobby wrote:We were punished for that through the exclusion from ATX, which hit both of our teams, while CCP only decided to exclude one of yours. That's because they had a reason to be vengeful against HYDRA and no reason to be so against PL. We understand that we ruined the ATIX final, we understand that we caused CCP a massive embarrassment and lost them money. We are sorry for that and have no intention of repeating that performance. This is what happens when you deliberately miss-interpret and distort my posts in order to support your own agenda.
Since all you guys appear to have left in your bag of tricks is word games, I'm not inclined to worry too much. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1095
|
Posted - 2015.09.23 09:21:44 -
[63] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:But you did repeat it.
This right now, is a repetition. You are just repeating the same allegation as if it's fact, which it isn't.
Captain Thunk wrote:PL didn't get punished because it did nothing wrong (traditional definition, not Hydra definition). Crying because PL didn't take the fall what Hydra did isn't likely to get you much sympathy The quote being referenced is taken from a post where I'm pointing out why PL didn't get hit in the same way, because they didn't commit an offense. I've dealt with that distinction at length, including several posts saying that Waffles didn't do anything wrong.
I'm not sure why you think I want sympathy from anyone.
Do you really have nothing else but this? |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1160
|
Posted - 2015.09.23 13:23:45 -
[64] - Quote
Mr Rive wrote:ITs the tournament. That's what its there to do. Make a ruleset so that the best pilots come out on top. If it doesnt do that, then there is no point in there being a tournament at all. Are you saying that the best pilots didn't come out on top this year? |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1160
|
Posted - 2015.09.23 14:07:08 -
[65] - Quote
Mr Rive wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:Mr Rive wrote:ITs the tournament. That's what its there to do. Make a ruleset so that the best pilots come out on top. If it doesnt do that, then there is no point in there being a tournament at all. Are you saying that the best pilots didn't come out on top this year? no of COURSE not, but its funny every time hydra has just ran one team, we seem to wipe the floor with you :itsamystery: It's true, we only managed to achieve 2nd place and PL took 1st on both of those occasions.
It just goes to show how important having a good team to practice with is. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1160
|
Posted - 2015.09.24 03:42:00 -
[66] - Quote
Elizabeth Norn wrote:Bad Bobby wrote:Mr Rive wrote:ITs the tournament. That's what its there to do. Make a ruleset so that the best pilots come out on top. If it doesnt do that, then there is no point in there being a tournament at all. Are you saying that the best pilots didn't come out on top this year? This isn't something we could know from watching the tournament. I was only asking for a clarification of Rive's opinion. I agree that watching the tournament doesn't provide that information.
W0lf Crendraven wrote:Captain Thunk wrote:If DHB's logs are skype logs then it's been game over since day 1, most people have assumed they were skype logs. Skype logs are stored for 30 days by default on Skypes cloud servers and cannot be edited by users. All Wildcat has ever had to do is have a Skype call with a CCP employee and share his screen (inbuilt in Skype) and simply scroll up to the relevent part of the convo - just 1 of countless ways CCP can verify the logs. It's no secret and I'm sure there are Hydra pilots that have complied fully with the investigation because they knew this was always a slamdunk by Wildcat. The other 12 pages were just me enjoying myself I was going to to say "Thats not proof in any way or form, someone can make a skype account and call himself Kadesh, talk to his other account, collude with himself and then submit that as proof. Since you cant proof that it was the actual person it doesnt count" But yeah, if he simply screenshared proof that it was indeed the leadership by virtues of showing it was him in other chat rooms then it probably would count. However the presence of authenticated skype logs between Kadesh and DHB says nothing about the authenticity of the claims made in them. I could convo DHB and tell him I've just eaten his lunch, he might become upset about that, but his lunch may still be in the fridge where he left it.
But we're already several steps down the rabbit hole. We still don't know if there are any skype logs. Also there are plenty of convos between Warlords AT members that contradict the statements made in DHB's logs. This is why we don't treat hearsay as evidence. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1161
|
Posted - 2015.09.24 03:55:43 -
[67] - Quote
Lovey Dovey wrote:Bad Bobby wrote: Sure, I'll swap it for evidence that your opinion matters.
There's no need to be so upset at a simple request to prove a claim you made. That doesn't look like evidence to me. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1161
|
Posted - 2015.09.24 05:05:17 -
[68] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:Bad Bobby wrote: However the presence of authenticated skype logs between Kadesh and DHB says nothing about the authenticity of the claims made in them. I could convo DHB and tell him I've just eaten his lunch, he might become upset about that, but his lunch may still be in the fridge where he left it.
But we're already several steps down the rabbit hole. We still don't know if there are any skype logs. Also there are plenty of convos between Warlords AT members that contradict the statements made in DHB's logs. This is why we don't treat hearsay as evidence.
If you read the logs before they were moderated (available on other sites) then you will know that the Team Captain explicitly talked about throwing matches by arrangement between the Hydra heads. It can be verified from DHB Wildcats client as I described, although not from Kadesh's, as he can delete single messages. If Wildcats claims are true and CCP screenshare to witness the logs still in place then it's case closed. No room to spin with it. No, as I pointed out in that quote. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1193
|
Posted - 2015.09.28 12:03:02 -
[69] - Quote
As Dancul says, Logibro, the person who is handling this is a busy man.
It takes as long as it takes and it's important that it isn't rushed. |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine In Tea We Trust
1249
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 04:28:06 -
[70] - Quote
Captain Thunk wrote:Can we get a reaction from Bad Bobby to the recent development? Sure!
See you again next year! |
|
|
|
|